<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Meditation on the Divine Will</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thesoapboxers.com/meditation-on-the-divine-will/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thesoapboxers.com/meditation-on-the-divine-will/</link> <description>A web magazine that covers a world of topics every week.  New articles published daily.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:34:12 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: claire</title><link>http://www.thesoapboxers.com/meditation-on-the-divine-will/comment-page-1/#comment-7845</link> <dc:creator>claire</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:55:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesoapboxers.com/?p=2706#comment-7845</guid> <description>Mr. Kelly,
Googling the passage you quote, I stumbled across your post this morning and am not one of your regular readers. Your editorial omission of &#039;civil&#039; and &#039;Union&#039; intrigued me. Why did you do it? and having omitted them, why, then, immediately state the fact without offering an explanation for your decision? By removing Lincoln&#039;s references to the (very broadly stated) historical events that prompted his musing did you think to universalize his words? to give them a greater accessibility to your contemporary audience? Or was the omission related to your own pacifistic beliefs?
Confused,
--and admittedly somewhat concerned for the integrity of Lincoln’s great words,--
C</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Kelly,<br
/> Googling the passage you quote, I stumbled across your post this morning and am not one of your regular readers. Your editorial omission of &#8216;civil&#8217; and &#8216;Union&#8217; intrigued me. Why did you do it? and having omitted them, why, then, immediately state the fact without offering an explanation for your decision? By removing Lincoln&#8217;s references to the (very broadly stated) historical events that prompted his musing did you think to universalize his words? to give them a greater accessibility to your contemporary audience? Or was the omission related to your own pacifistic beliefs?<br
/> Confused,<br
/> &#8211;and admittedly somewhat concerned for the integrity of Lincoln’s great words,&#8211;<br
/> C<br
/> <small>Total Comment by <i>claire</i>: 1</small></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.122 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 388/392 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.thesoapboxers.com @ 2012-02-09 04:37:30 -->
