Pecking Order
Peter Rabbit - See all 10 of my articles
Leave the First Comment
Pecking Order
The pecking order on the playground determines who is the strongest and who is the weakest and who is that crazy red headed child that you just don’t want to fight as he has been known to bite. The rules of engagement on the playground are fairly simple. Don’t start a fight with anyone higher than you on the pecking order, don’t start a fight with someone too much lower as this is looked upon as bullying and never ever start a fight with that red headed kid. As all children know this “order” on the playground is essential not to encourage or create conflict but to avoid it. In the real world we have examples of this such as the mutual assured destruction theory that the nuclear proliferation brought to the world as the US and former USSR accumulated more nuclear weapons then anyone would ever need.
So where am I going with all of this in terms of Middle East politics? Well, I read the discussion between Syria and Israel the other day with both sides threatening to crush the other in all out war and suddenly realized that the Middle East pecking order has been disturbed. For the better part of the last 30 years it has been clear to countries such as Syria that Israel was not to be challenged in all out war. This thinking came about after some wars that ended very badly for Arab states such as Syria were fought in 40s-70s. At that time the pecking order was well established and maintained until now. As a side note, depending on who you are you may either see Israel as fairly high on the pecking order due to military strength or the red headed child due to their nuclear weapons and dire need to survive at any cost but for a long time now I don’t think anyone saw them as the weakling that you all took turns beating on.
So how did our precious pecking order become unraveled? I blame guerilla warfare and terrorism. It has long been established that even a strong army such as Israel or the US or back in the day the USSR has a lot of difficulty waging war in non-conventional fashion. When you can just roll out the tanks and drop a bunch of bombs I would argue that these three armies had no equal in war but as we found out in Vietnam, Afghanistan (US and USSR wars), Iraq, Lebanon and many others these armies are not nearly as dominant when there are no tanks on the other side.
Trying to fight a war when the enemy hides behind human shields, puts no value on life (their own, the enemies or civilians) and generally does not meet you on a field of battle is very difficult. The examples set in recent engagements such as Lebanon has created a false sense of confidence in countries like Syria that they too can take on the Israeli army. To me this may be even a bigger problem than the current terrorist problem as all out war between Israel and its neighbors always leads to a lot of death, no resolutions and now that all of these countries have more advanced weapons it can lead to “mutual assured destruction”. Maybe not in the sense of nuclear war but in the sense that the infrastructure damage and loss of life that a big Middle Eastern war threatens may not be something Israel or the poorer Arab countries may ever recover from.
For right or for wrong I think the pecking order in the Middle East is critical for peace in the larger sense of the word. While it is peace based more on fear or understanding of your enemy’s power it never the less accomplishes the goal. I am not sure what the solution is and I don’t want to advocate war but I see two ways to re-establish the pecking order. One, Israel should stage a pre-emptive strike and make a statement that will remind some of its neighbors what the pecking order is. Two, a bigger kid needs to move onto the block and establish that if any beatings go on it will be only them beating on someone else. Obviously in my analogy the bigger kid is the US. Neither option is pretty and I don’t expect a lot of support for either but I have not come up with a third alternative. I know one thing, talking has never solved anything in the Middle East so I have ruled that option out.
- Wednesday Wisps Today we introduce what I will call âWednesday Wispsâ. This is similar to the potpourri term I have used in...
- Analysis of The NFL Draft Coverage Letâs talk about the NFL Draft It is the beginning of the Baseball season, the first round of both the...
- Rules of Engagement This month I wanted to express my opinion on the investigations of the "war crimes" supposedly committed during Operation Cast...
- Skiing Lexicon pt 1 There are a lot of things that you should do in order to prepare yourself for the slopes this upcoming...
- Which Classic and Modern Commemorative Coins are Worth Collecting? The answer to the question of which classic and modern commemorative coins are worth collecting is subjective. There are many...
- Soldiers : Israel's utter failure! It has been reported that Israeli soldiers told veteran groups that the war this year was like entering the “moral...
Comments
Leave a Reply
Set up a customized icon to appear next to your comments! Is your comment not appearing? Don't worry - I'm not censoring you. Your comment just got caught in my spam filter. It will be viewable shortly (almost always within 24 hours, and much more quickly 90% of the time).Copyright for all content belongs to the writer identified in the byline. Copyright for any content not associated with a particular writer belongs to Kosmo. Copyright for comments belongs to the writer of the comment.
Content from The Soap Boxers cannot be reused in any manner other than what is allowed under the fair use doctrine of US copyright law or the applicable copyright laws of your country.
© 2008-2010. All rights reserved.
Please email Kosmo at Kosmo@ObservingCasually.com with any questions you may have.
The Soap Boxers is a division of Hyrax Publications




