<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Shirley Sherrod, The White House, And The NAACP</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thesoapboxers.com/shirley-sherrod-the-white-house-and-the-naacp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thesoapboxers.com/shirley-sherrod-the-white-house-and-the-naacp/</link> <description>A web magazine that covers a world of topics every week.  New articles published daily.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:34:12 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Jumping to Conclusions &#8211; Again (Shirley Sherrod, BP, and the Lockerbie Bomber)</title><link>http://www.thesoapboxers.com/shirley-sherrod-the-white-house-and-the-naacp/comment-page-1/#comment-8042</link> <dc:creator>Jumping to Conclusions &#8211; Again (Shirley Sherrod, BP, and the Lockerbie Bomber)</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 20:15:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.observingcasually.com/?p=3882#comment-8042</guid> <description>[...] week The Crunchy Conservative had an article about Shirley Sherrod (the woman at the USDA who was dismissed after a tape of her speech before the NAACP was released.  [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] week The Crunchy Conservative had an article about Shirley Sherrod (the woman at the USDA who was dismissed after a tape of her speech before the NAACP was released.  [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Artur @ Brokerage Reviews</title><link>http://www.thesoapboxers.com/shirley-sherrod-the-white-house-and-the-naacp/comment-page-1/#comment-6068</link> <dc:creator>Artur @ Brokerage Reviews</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:00:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.observingcasually.com/?p=3882#comment-6068</guid> <description>Congrats on baby boy! You just brought to life another one who will be to blame for all the wrongs in America... ha-ha!Before rehiring Sherrod I would check her record on who kept a farm and who lost it when she was in charge based on racial identity.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on baby boy! You just brought to life another one who will be to blame for all the wrongs in America&#8230; ha-ha!</p><p>Before rehiring Sherrod I would check her record on who kept a farm and who lost it when she was in charge based on racial identity.<br
/> <small>Total Comment by <i>Artur @ Brokerage Reviews</i>: 1</small></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Martin Kelly</title><link>http://www.thesoapboxers.com/shirley-sherrod-the-white-house-and-the-naacp/comment-page-1/#comment-5943</link> <dc:creator>Martin Kelly</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:47:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.observingcasually.com/?p=3882#comment-5943</guid> <description>I watched the Rachel rant as well, and also do not know why.  I thought it was funny her complaining about Fox getting the story (right or wrong).  If she was such a good reporter (or anyone at MSMBC was anything other than an opinion spouter) she should have gotten the full tape and had the report that put the Fox report down.Did Sherrod deserve to get fired?  I have no idea.  What I know is that she was appoint to the position last year, the fuller tape has her repeat that she conciously chose not to do her job (assist all farmere in her region to understand and utilize the USDA rules).  Her follow in interviews seem to paint her as one of those people who think that the president is &quot;not black enough&quot; and that she is not concerned about loosing hre job, but is concerned about not be able to help &quot;level the feild&quot;.I have to agree with Squeeky, wondering about her interpretation of what her job was.  I also agree with Even that we as Americans are so quick to judge based on opinion.  We are far to much into instant gratification.Congraduation on the Baby!  May you and your family prosper.Hooray for the Soap Boxer!  This new chapter should be even more fun.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched the Rachel rant as well, and also do not know why.  I thought it was funny her complaining about Fox getting the story (right or wrong).  If she was such a good reporter (or anyone at MSMBC was anything other than an opinion spouter) she should have gotten the full tape and had the report that put the Fox report down.</p><p>Did Sherrod deserve to get fired?  I have no idea.  What I know is that she was appoint to the position last year, the fuller tape has her repeat that she conciously chose not to do her job (assist all farmere in her region to understand and utilize the USDA rules).  Her follow in interviews seem to paint her as one of those people who think that the president is &#8220;not black enough&#8221; and that she is not concerned about loosing hre job, but is concerned about not be able to help &#8220;level the feild&#8221;.</p><p>I have to agree with Squeeky, wondering about her interpretation of what her job was.  I also agree with Even that we as Americans are so quick to judge based on opinion.  We are far to much into instant gratification.</p><p>Congraduation on the Baby!  May you and your family prosper.</p><p>Hooray for the Soap Boxer!  This new chapter should be even more fun.<br
/> <small>Total Comments by <i>Martin Kelly</i>: 184</small></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Evan @40Tech</title><link>http://www.thesoapboxers.com/shirley-sherrod-the-white-house-and-the-naacp/comment-page-1/#comment-5936</link> <dc:creator>Evan @40Tech</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 01:22:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.observingcasually.com/?p=3882#comment-5936</guid> <description>And, hey, Kosmo - I see the Soapboxers is now live!  Congratulations!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And, hey, Kosmo &#8211; I see the Soapboxers is now live!  Congratulations!<br
/> <span
class="cluv">Evan @40Tech´s last post ..<a
class="3478cad876 5936" rel="nofollow" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/40tech/~3/TROfmXi-olU/">How to Get All Your Mail Accounts into Gmail- With No POP3 Delay</a></span><br
/> <small>Total Comments by <i>Evan @40Tech</i>: 104</small></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Evan @40Tech</title><link>http://www.thesoapboxers.com/shirley-sherrod-the-white-house-and-the-naacp/comment-page-1/#comment-5935</link> <dc:creator>Evan @40Tech</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 01:20:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.observingcasually.com/?p=3882#comment-5935</guid> <description>Congrats on the baby boy!One gripe jumps to mind.  I&#039;m not going to argue which stations have good reporting and which don&#039;t but since when do RATINGS determine whether a station has good reporting or not?  Unfortunately, much in American appeals to the lowest common denominator.  That doesn&#039;t qualify it as &quot;good,&quot; especially with respect to journalism and reporting.  I&#039;d be surprised, anyway, if Glen Beck would even call himself a reporter.  I don&#039;t mean that as a slight, either.  I&#039;d think he&#039;d call himself an entertainer, etc.  Fox went through that several months ago, when explaining which of their shows were news shows, and which were opinion shows, when certain biases and inaccuracies came to light.The problem with both MSNBC and Fox is that too many people on the left and the right view many of their shows as news, and, worse yet, use those shows as the sole basis, or a main foundation, for their opinions and world views.  I see a direct correlation in my friends on both sides of the political spectrum with the amount of time they spend watching those channels, and their polarity on the political spectrum.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on the baby boy!</p><p>One gripe jumps to mind.  I&#8217;m not going to argue which stations have good reporting and which don&#8217;t but since when do RATINGS determine whether a station has good reporting or not?  Unfortunately, much in American appeals to the lowest common denominator.  That doesn&#8217;t qualify it as &#8220;good,&#8221; especially with respect to journalism and reporting.  I&#8217;d be surprised, anyway, if Glen Beck would even call himself a reporter.  I don&#8217;t mean that as a slight, either.  I&#8217;d think he&#8217;d call himself an entertainer, etc.  Fox went through that several months ago, when explaining which of their shows were news shows, and which were opinion shows, when certain biases and inaccuracies came to light.</p><p>The problem with both MSNBC and Fox is that too many people on the left and the right view many of their shows as news, and, worse yet, use those shows as the sole basis, or a main foundation, for their opinions and world views.  I see a direct correlation in my friends on both sides of the political spectrum with the amount of time they spend watching those channels, and their polarity on the political spectrum.<br
/> <small>Total Comments by <i>Evan @40Tech</i>: 104</small></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Squeaky</title><link>http://www.thesoapboxers.com/shirley-sherrod-the-white-house-and-the-naacp/comment-page-1/#comment-5913</link> <dc:creator>Squeaky</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.observingcasually.com/?p=3882#comment-5913</guid> <description>Nice to see an article from you Crunchy!  Congratulations on the birth of your baby boy. =)This situation has been one heck of a mess from the start.  There are two things that no one has touched on I would like to point out.First, when Sherrod was telling her story and made those comments about not helping the white farmer, did anyone notice the cheering from the crowd?  It sounds like racism from the group to me (not Sherrod but the group).  Isn&#039;t that exactly what the NAACP says that they stand against?I also didn&#039;t appreciate it when Sherrod said that she realized that her job isn&#039;t black vs white, it&#039;s about the haves vs the have nots.  Doesn&#039;t that still sound divisive?  In my opinion it is NOT about haves vs have nots.  It&#039;s about helping people in need---notice the difference?  You could have a farm that produces millions of dollars in revenues each year (Haves) but have millions in debt piled up in necessary equipment making them bankrupt.  Are they ineligible for help?Squeaky...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see an article from you Crunchy!  Congratulations on the birth of your baby boy. =)</p><p>This situation has been one heck of a mess from the start.  There are two things that no one has touched on I would like to point out.</p><p>First, when Sherrod was telling her story and made those comments about not helping the white farmer, did anyone notice the cheering from the crowd?  It sounds like racism from the group to me (not Sherrod but the group).  Isn&#8217;t that exactly what the NAACP says that they stand against?</p><p>I also didn&#8217;t appreciate it when Sherrod said that she realized that her job isn&#8217;t black vs white, it&#8217;s about the haves vs the have nots.  Doesn&#8217;t that still sound divisive?  In my opinion it is NOT about haves vs have nots.  It&#8217;s about helping people in need&#8212;notice the difference?  You could have a farm that produces millions of dollars in revenues each year (Haves) but have millions in debt piled up in necessary equipment making them bankrupt.  Are they ineligible for help?</p><p>Squeaky&#8230;<br
/> <span
class="cluv">Squeaky´s last post ..<a
class="1b30961256 5913" rel="nofollow" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/TheCasualObserver/~3/SS_l7VXU5SY/">Shirley Sherrod- The White House- And The NAACP</a></span><br
/> <small>Total Comments by <i>Squeaky</i>: 187</small></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/26 queries in 0.984 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 509/537 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.thesoapboxers.com @ 2012-02-09 05:23:25 -->
