<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Microsoft Overlooks Windows 7 Upgrade Process Issues</title> <atom:link href="http://www.thesoapboxers.com/windows-7-upgrade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.thesoapboxers.com/windows-7-upgrade/</link> <description>A web magazine that covers a world of topics every week.  New articles published daily.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:34:12 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: kosmo</title><link>http://www.thesoapboxers.com/windows-7-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-629</link> <dc:creator>kosmo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 05:41:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesoapboxers.com/?p=1624#comment-629</guid> <description>Good point about the upgrades.  I&#039;m thinking that everything with a 603e or older processor was  officially incapable of running OS X, but I might be wrong about that.Some of the Macs back then were fairly upgradeable.  I think some had ZIF sockets to allow processors upgrades, although the bus might have imposed limitations.  Again, pulling this back from memory.The lower end machines weren&#039;t particularly upgradeable, though.  I had a 6500 that wasn&#039;t technically processor upgradeable, but I had a card that slipped into the level 2 cache slot (equivalent of &quot;pipeline burst cache&quot; on intel machine, I think) to make the 225mhz 603e behave like a 300 mhz G3.  Not sure if that was so that I could run OS X or something else.One cool thing, though, was that you could go to Apple&#039;s website and immediately see if your computer was officially supported for OS X or not.  No tap dance between OS vendor and hardware vendor.OS 9 to OS X was a pretty sizable technical jump - the entire basic infrastructure was completely replaced.Ah, good memories ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point about the upgrades.  I&#8217;m thinking that everything with a 603e or older processor was  officially incapable of running OS X, but I might be wrong about that.</p><p>Some of the Macs back then were fairly upgradeable.  I think some had ZIF sockets to allow processors upgrades, although the bus might have imposed limitations.  Again, pulling this back from memory.</p><p>The lower end machines weren&#8217;t particularly upgradeable, though.  I had a 6500 that wasn&#8217;t technically processor upgradeable, but I had a card that slipped into the level 2 cache slot (equivalent of &#8220;pipeline burst cache&#8221; on intel machine, I think) to make the 225mhz 603e behave like a 300 mhz G3.  Not sure if that was so that I could run OS X or something else.</p><p>One cool thing, though, was that you could go to Apple&#8217;s website and immediately see if your computer was officially supported for OS X or not.  No tap dance between OS vendor and hardware vendor.</p><p>OS 9 to OS X was a pretty sizable technical jump &#8211; the entire basic infrastructure was completely replaced.</p><p>Ah, good memories &#8230;<br
/> <small>Total Comments by <i>kosmo</i>: 589</small></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James Bathgate</title><link>http://www.thesoapboxers.com/windows-7-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-628</link> <dc:creator>James Bathgate</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:51:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesoapboxers.com/?p=1624#comment-628</guid> <description>@Kosmo: It&#039;s really a mixture of two things. The first of which is what you mentioned with the lack of software. People were allowed to upgrade from Mac OS 9 to Mac OS X, but a lot of their software just stopped working.The other is the fact that a majority of the machines running Mac OS 9 had to be upgraded to run Mac OS X (sounds like Vista). That&#039;s no easy task with Apple computers and generally means tossing out the old machine and buying a new one.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Kosmo: It&#8217;s really a mixture of two things. The first of which is what you mentioned with the lack of software. People were allowed to upgrade from Mac OS 9 to Mac OS X, but a lot of their software just stopped working.</p><p>The other is the fact that a majority of the machines running Mac OS 9 had to be upgraded to run Mac OS X (sounds like Vista). That&#8217;s no easy task with Apple computers and generally means tossing out the old machine and buying a new one.<br
/> <small>Total Comments by <i>James Bathgate</i>: 6</small></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kosmo</title><link>http://www.thesoapboxers.com/windows-7-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-623</link> <dc:creator>kosmo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:32:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesoapboxers.com/?p=1624#comment-623</guid> <description>@JamesWhat sort of problems did you run into when upgrading from OS 9 to OS X?  A clean install was definitely not required - I&#039;m am certain I didn&#039;t do one.If you&#039;re referring to the lack of applications that ran natively in OS X, you have a point.  The implementation of the classic environment could have been a bit better.  However, worst case scenario, you could simply reboot into OS9.I loved the OS9 and earlier method of fixing OS problems.  Keep a good backup stashed on the HD.  When problems popped up, boot from CD and activate the &quot;good&quot; system folder (and incrementally add back the changes until you figured out what broke it.I have a Mini and an eMac (main blogging computer, built in 2002) at home, but have to use Windows at work.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@James</p><p>What sort of problems did you run into when upgrading from OS 9 to OS X?  A clean install was definitely not required &#8211; I&#8217;m am certain I didn&#8217;t do one.</p><p>If you&#8217;re referring to the lack of applications that ran natively in OS X, you have a point.  The implementation of the classic environment could have been a bit better.  However, worst case scenario, you could simply reboot into OS9.</p><p>I loved the OS9 and earlier method of fixing OS problems.  Keep a good backup stashed on the HD.  When problems popped up, boot from CD and activate the &#8220;good&#8221; system folder (and incrementally add back the changes until you figured out what broke it.</p><p>I have a Mini and an eMac (main blogging computer, built in 2002) at home, but have to use Windows at work.<br
/> <small>Total Comments by <i>kosmo</i>: 589</small></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: James Bathgate</title><link>http://www.thesoapboxers.com/windows-7-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-620</link> <dc:creator>James Bathgate</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:15:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesoapboxers.com/?p=1624#comment-620</guid> <description>@Evan: Software is definitely going to be an issue. I know a lot of people who use the CD burning or video editing software that came with their machine. If they do a clean install they&#039;ll wipe out that software and the licensing on software that comes with machines usually doesn&#039;t allow for upgrading to a new operating system.@Peter: I&#039;m waiting for my new MacBook Pro from work and I can&#039;t wait. However, the upgrade process from Mac OS 9 to Mac OS X was not very nice either.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Evan: Software is definitely going to be an issue. I know a lot of people who use the CD burning or video editing software that came with their machine. If they do a clean install they&#8217;ll wipe out that software and the licensing on software that comes with machines usually doesn&#8217;t allow for upgrading to a new operating system.</p><p>@Peter: I&#8217;m waiting for my new MacBook Pro from work and I can&#8217;t wait. However, the upgrade process from Mac OS 9 to Mac OS X was not very nice either.<br
/> <small>Total Comments by <i>James Bathgate</i>: 6</small></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Peter Rabbit</title><link>http://www.thesoapboxers.com/windows-7-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-618</link> <dc:creator>Peter Rabbit</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:01:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesoapboxers.com/?p=1624#comment-618</guid> <description>Good article.I use a Mac, have converted my wife to Macs, have converted my niece and my parents to Mac.While I am not one to bash Microsoft as I use all Windows products at work and like them this is a big problem.I think many, many people will wipe out their data without even knowing it and many are just not tech savvy enough or don&#039;t have the equipement to do full backups.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.</p><p>I use a Mac, have converted my wife to Macs, have converted my niece and my parents to Mac.</p><p>While I am not one to bash Microsoft as I use all Windows products at work and like them this is a big problem.</p><p>I think many, many people will wipe out their data without even knowing it and many are just not tech savvy enough or don&#8217;t have the equipement to do full backups.<br
/> <small>Total Comments by <i>Peter Rabbit</i>: 44</small></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Evan</title><link>http://www.thesoapboxers.com/windows-7-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-605</link> <dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 01:36:22 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.thesoapboxers.com/?p=1624#comment-605</guid> <description>I&#039;ll be doing a clean install, so never even gave this much thought, but I think you&#039;re right- this will cause a world of hurt for many people.  The biggest problem will be for people with programs that are preinstalled, which they will completely lose during the upgrade.
.-= Evan´s last blog ..&lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/40tech/~3/Bx3QizNgMT4/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The Most Exciting 3 Months in Tech – Ever?&lt;/a&gt; =-.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be doing a clean install, so never even gave this much thought, but I think you&#8217;re right- this will cause a world of hurt for many people.  The biggest problem will be for people with programs that are preinstalled, which they will completely lose during the upgrade.<br
/> .-= Evan´s last blog ..<a
href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/40tech/~3/Bx3QizNgMT4/" rel="nofollow">The Most Exciting 3 Months in Tech – Ever?</a> =-.<br
/> <small>Total Comments by <i>Evan</i>: 104</small></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 3/24 queries in 1.364 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 503/522 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.thesoapboxers.com @ 2012-02-09 01:46:19 -->
