Cardinals Fan Reaction to Pujols Leaving

December 8, 2011

- See all 20 of my articles

Note: In the wake of Albert Pujols opting to leave the Cardinals and sign with the Angels, I asked a friend of mine who is a die-hard Cardinals fan to write about his reaction.

Albert Pujols is leaving the St. Louis Cardinals to join the Los Angeles Angels for a reported 10 year, 250 million dollar contract. And apparently, the Angels contract wasn’t worth as much as the Miami Marlins’ offer. The Marlins apparently offered Pujols 10 years, 275 million, but they wouldn’t give Albert a no-trade clause. Hearing these numbers, the Cardinals didn’t have a chance. They simply could not afford THAT much money.

To be honest, the big mistake by the Cardinals was not taking care of this several years ago when you could work with him and his agent. The worst thing that could happen for the Cardinals was for Albert to make it to Free Agency. And that’s a mistake I’m sure the they now regret.

My reaction as a Cardinals fan has to be to look for the silver lining. In one regard, he is going to the American League. Obviously, if he’s going to another team, it’s great that he’s leaving the league so you don’t have to compete against him. You may see him in the World Series, but even then, if you see him there, it means that the Cardinals were good enough to get back there without him. Secondly, this relieves quite a financial burden on the Cardinals organization. They will not be bogged down during the second part of a long-term contract with an aging player whose numbers will likely decline. Now, the Cardinals can go after several quality players and bolster their line-up.

As the Winter Meetings continue, they may decide to go after a premiere shortstop, or a quality pitcher. The Cardinals now know they don’t have Pujols and can therefore be an influential player in the remainder of the Winter Meetings. It’s an opportunity to fills multiple gaps rather than be hamstrung with a massive, long-term contract with one player.

Another aspect is that Cardinals fans can feel confident that the Cardinals now have the resources to keep Adam Wainwright. When his contract comes up after the 2013 season, Wainwright will likely demand much more than his current contract, $21 million over two years. It appears now that keeping Wainwright is no longer a worry.

Finally, I know that many Cardinals fans may feel betrayed by Pujols for leaving. He always stated it wasn’t about the money. Apparently it was. But personally, I want to thank Albert for the past 11 seasons. Over those 11 years I got to see a man play baseball who will go down as one of the best baseball players to ever play the game…if not THE best. With Pujols, the Cardinals went to 3 World Series, winning two of them. However, we won before without him, and we will win again without him. St. Louis is a passionate baseball city, and Cardinals management will do their best to bring a World Championship back to St. Louis.

It’s the end of an era. And while we’d hoped that he would be our generations “Stan the Man”, it just wasn’t meant to be.

2 Comments (+add yours?)

  1. kosmo
    Dec 08, 2011 @ 14:22:46

    Some thoughts:

    1) After five years with the Marlins, Pujols would b a 5 and 10 man (10+ years in the majors, and 5+ years with the same team) and per the collective bargaining agreement would be able to veto any trades, even without a no-trade clause in his contract. So what this seems to say to me is that the Marlins aren’t completely sure they’d hang on to Pujols for 5 years. What does that say about the team’s commitment to winning?

    2) Signing with an AL club does make a lot of sense for Pujols.The existence of the DH means that he’ll be able to take an occassional half day off during the season, and can transition to full time DH in the later stages of the contract. Player decline as they get older. Sad, but true. In many cases, the decline is steep.

    3) The Cardinals would have been much better off if the Marlins had signed him. Why? The 1st round pick they receive as part of the compensation would have been a much better pick.

    4) At some point this season, some idiotic writer was predicting which current players would be first ballot Hall of Famers. He had Jeter as a first ball HOFer, but not Pujols. The argument was the Pujols wasn’t a winner. Even before this season’s championship, he’d made it to two world series. Maybe that’s not on par with the string of titles for the Yankees, but it’s ridiculous that Pujols would be deemed “not a winner”.


  2. Dave
    Dec 09, 2011 @ 10:11:17

    Part of me does feel betrayed. He’s been promising Cardinals fans for years “it’s not about the money”. Apparently it was. Had to laugh at a quote by Lance Berkman who, while working his latest deal with the Cards, was asked what the hang-up was. Berkman responded, “it’s about the money. It’s ALWAYS about the money. Don’t believe anyone who tells you differently.”

    Looks like Lance was right.


Leave a Reply